Archive for Comics

Batmanic Depressive

// September 1st, 2010 // No Comments » // Comics, commentary

It's a bird, its a plane, it the worst mistake in recent Batman memory!

As you’ve no doubt heard by now, DC is splitting Batman in two.

Two Batmans… Batmen… Batpeople.  Dick Grayson will remain in his role as Batman whiiillle Bruce Wayne returns… also as Batman.

I don’t know what the fan opinions are on this, but despite my penchant for ranting, I’m fairly indifferent.  I think it’s stupid, sure.  I love Bruce Wayne as Batman, and I love Dick Grayson as Nightwing.  That’s where Grayson shines; a unique identity that doesn’t force me to keep thinking “this wouldn’t suck so much if it were Bruce”.  BUT…

This is just another drop in the well.

And the change won’t last long.  The reality is, this is DC doing damage control.  Over the last several years, DC has systematically ruined almost every “new” character it had in a legacy identity to make way for the classic characters of yesteryear.  They did it with the Atom.  They’re doing it with Firestorm.  And most famously replaced were Wally and Kyle in favor of Barry and Hal.  The last two are big deals.  There was plenty of room to bring back Hal Jordan without getting rid of Kyle.  It’s taken several years, but they did eventually push him to the back.  He’s still around, but only barely.  Nixing Wally in favor Barry Allen is another story altogether.  Wally is not only a better character, but a better Flash than Barry.  DC has developed a reputation for this sort of stunt.  Most annoying is the reason for it.  No matter what excuse they give, the identity regressions are attributable almost entirely to the fact that their writers want comics to be just like they were when they were 13 years old. The story be damned.

As pointed out, sometimes it works, sometime not so much.

To solve this little PR mini-crisis, DC intends to have their cake and eat it too.  They have two Batmans… or whatever.   “Hey look, we’re not going backwards!  We’re going forward! This is a new idea.  Promise!”   Except it won’t last.

First of all, it’s confusing.  If you have two Bat— fuck it.  If Bruce and Dick are both running around in the cowl, it’s just going to confuse the hell out of everyone.  I’m already confused just trying to explain it.

Secondly, this is just another example of why DC needs to re-staff it’s Batman office.  Grant Morrison has completely lost it.   Batman, Inc?  It’s Brave and the Bold with a ridiculous title.   Corporate Batman?  Are you kidding me.  No.  (Not to mention he used that idea in the JLA Rock of Ages storyline.)   And all of the greatness of his Batman run prior to RIP is long since forgotten.  Get rid of him.

Batman is in serious need of a new direction, but this isn’t it.

Sooner or later, DC is going to figure that out.  Until then, I’m not mad.  I just don’t care to read it.

Read It Where You Want

// August 25th, 2010 // No Comments » // Comics, commentary

It seems that this coming Saturday (Aug, 28)  is “Read Comics In Public” Day.

It’s meant to foster closet comics readers into spreading their love and sharing it with the world.  Sorry, but this is bullshit.  I love the idea of comics gaining new readers, but the community needs to stop wasting it’s time trying to legitimize itself.

Making movies based on Batman rarely brings in new readers.  And certainly holding silly stunts won’t do it.

Don’t get me wrong. I’m very supportive of other events like Free Comic Book Day and 24 Hour Comic Day. But that’s because these are actual events that foster the community.  Having an event that encourages comic lovers to read in public has one essential flaw.  It implies that comic readers generally don’t like letting people know who they are and what they read.

Every actual comic reader I know has no problem reading their books in public.  I do it all the time.  I won’t get on an airplane without picking up a new trade paperback, because the flight attendant can’t bitch at me that my “comic book isn’t supposed to be on during take off”.  I read comics in restaurants and occasionally bring my pulls to work on new comics day.  And I don’t do any of this to prove a point; I do it because I love reading comics and there is absolutely no reason that I should see it as shameful.

RCiP Day isn’t for people who read comics. It’s for hipsters who tell people they’re reading **”Graphic Novels”.  Again, I’m all for gaining new comic fans. The industry needs it.  But something like this brings in people who pretend to be fans because nerds are en vogue right now.

Howsabout this instead?  ”Read Comics Anywhere You Like At Any Time Because Comics Are Cool, Read Superhero Comics or Romance or Horror or Indie Comics, But Just Read Comics Because They’re Good”.

Too “on the nose”? Maybe a little wordy?

**Graphic Novels and comic books are not the same thing. A graphic novel is a hard cover comic featuring all new material in a self contained, long form story.  A comic book is the magazine style books  that have comics, be it reprinted or brand new, and often tell open-ended stories. GN’s are rarely published. Comics are not. In other words, while all GN’s are comics, the vast majority of comics are not graphic novels.

Spider-man May Shatter Dimensions, but Not Expectations

// July 22nd, 2010 // No Comments » // Comics, commentary

I may be over-reacting a little.   Last night I had stomach problems and kept waking up.  Then someone posted the ending to Inception on Facebook.

But I was really, really disappointed to find out that the fourth character in Spider-man: Shattered Dimensions will be Ultimate Peter Parker.  They made the announcement at SDCC yesterday.   The twist is that you’re playing Ult. Spider-man at the point where he gets taken over by the costume (I think) although for some reason he has the Venom emblem on his chest.

To be fair, the actual video looks pretty amazing.  It’s just that with all the other possibilities out there– Zombie Spidey, 1602 Spidey, Cosmic Spidey (which is included as a costume for GameStop customers)— hell, even Spider-Ham— why would they go Ultimate?  I played Venom in the very awesome Ultimate Spider-man game a few years back.  This feels like a re-tread.  At the very least they should have revealed Miguel O’hara (2099) last.  That is by far the most interesting choice of the three.  Would have been a much cooler reveal.

Anyway, this is probably going to be the greatest Spider-man game ever.  I probably just need to get laid so I won’t be so mopey.

Let the fanboy bitching begin!!!

// June 29th, 2010 // 10 Comments » // Comics, commentary

admittedly, she does look like she got her costume at Forever 21

So DC debuted Wonder Woman’s new costume today on it’s Source Blog, and already I can smell the fans pissing their pants with fanboy/girl angst.

Wonder Woman’s costume and character have always been considered iconic, in spite of the fact that no one really seems to like either one.  Just as Superman is the ultimate man, Diana is the ultimate woman.  She’s beautiful, smart and stronger than all the men in any room she happens to be in. HOW DARE THEY MESS WITH HER STATUS QUO??

Blah, blah, blah. Angst, angst, angst.

Wonder Woman may be one of the most iconic characters in fiction, but she has had a nasty history when it comes to costumes.  Diana was created during the Greatest Generation’s era, the Golden Age of comics.  Her costume was representative of the patriotism that permeated the culture of the time. While Superman’s costume was subtly reflective of this, WW’s creators went all out. And as much as I consider myself a patriot, I number among those that don’t think it makes much sense in modern storytelling.  Wonder Woman is a product of Greek culture.  Wrapping her in the Flag never made much sense.

But compared to some of her other costumes, the original is hands down the winner.  I mean, they put her in a karate gi in the 1970′s.  It was so ugly I couldn’t find it in a google search.

So here’s the thing.   The new costume isn’t that bad.

Yeah, yeah… I know.  But look at it.  With a few changes, it would actually be pretty decent.  I like the top, the boots and the long pants. I’m 50/50 on the choker and the bracelets, but I don’t have a problem with either.  My only real beef is with the cut off jacket and the tiara.  The tiara is necessary, and I like that it’s understated, but I’m not fond of the design.  The jacket… I don’t think it fits Diana’s character.  She has had a cut off jacket before.  During the William Messner Loebs era (the one that ousted Diana as WW and replaced her with Artemis), Mike Deodato designed a decent looking purple costume with a more modern feel.  And it had a jacket.  But eventually Diana donned the tiara again and got back into her classic gear, presumably because the new one didn’t show enough cleavage.  (I assume that’s why they’ll get rid of this one as well.)

The new costume is brought in as part of the introductory storyline of incoming writer J. Michael Straczynski and artist Don Kramer.  It was designed by comics legend Jim Lee.

It’s a solid costume.  In fact, it looks really good.  And with a little adjustment over time and artists it could last.  Sure, you could say Wonder Woman’s costume is intrinsic to her character. But so is Batman’s, and he’s had a whole mess of different costumes through the years. My only real complaint is that it looks more like a costume designed for a younger character such as Donna Troy.  But that’s a minor complaint at best.

And if history is any judge, we can assume that once JMS’ storyline is over, DC will put her back in her old costume anyway.

So quit yer bitchin’.

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Avengers #2

// June 25th, 2010 // No Comments » // Comics, Review

Dude, Wonder Man needs to lay off the roids. They make your package smaller.

Avengers is officially a frustrating book.

It’s like Bendis is actively trying to piss me off.

If you read my review of the first issue, you know I wasn’t a fan.  Sure there was enough there in the final pages to make me give it one last try, but it was honestly just a bad comic.

Avengers #2 is vastly improved from the first issue; which is to say it doesn’t bore the crap out of me.  In fact, I found a lot of the issue to be fairly entertaining.  Not all.  But a lot.    And that’s why it’s so damned frustrating.  This book constantly teases at the possibility of being good, but then hits you with some kind of hammy bullshit.

The Good

First of all, the art is vastly improved.  There are a few panels and instances that suck. (For instance, one splash page features exquisite foregrounds, while the backgrounds look like they were drawn by an 8 year old- including a shot of Wolverine curling Spider-Woman’s hair with his claws.)  Mostly though, Romita seems to be getting into a groove.  Janson’s inks are toned down so much that I honestly wonder if he really inked it.

Also, Romita’s handling of Iron Man’s new costume is sliiiiiiiiightly better.  The armor is a little less bulky.  And the mask doesn’t look quite like Heath Ledger’s face in Dark Knight.

As to the story itself… if last issue was the recruitment story, this is a purely expository issue.  A lot of things happen, but none of it really advances much of the plot.  Well, not much.  However what is does is introduce us to the newest Avenger (and hint: it ain’t the purple dude on the cover).  I don’t want to give away this character’s identity, but he’s a welcome surprise.  Oddly enough I had just been wondering a week ago what Marvel was doing with him. Glad to see he won’t just go back in the toy box and fall into obscurity.

The Bad

I sincerely wonder if Brian Michael Bendis doesn’t just hate Matt Fraction’s guts.  Because every single utterance from Tony Stark in Avengers pisses all over the work Fraction is doing in Invincible Iron Man.  I’ve said it before: Tony Stark is no longer rich.  He’s openly stated he has nothing in the way of solid assets.  He actually borrowed equipment and resources from Reed Richards to build his armor.   Not to mention the fact that he seems a lot more humble after basically tearing up the Marvel U for the last few years.  So why does Bendis have him tossing (or offering) around millions of dollars like it was nothing and swaggering around like the same old jackass he was writing in Mighty Avengers.   That’s the thing about working for big companies like Marvel.  You’re playing with other people’s toys… and most of the time you’re not the only one playing with that particular “Transformer”.  By ignoring Fraction’s work, Bendis effectively dismisses him as a writer.  After all, which story is likely to be canon, a big reboot of the Avengers or an Iron Man solo title?

Plus, he still seems to be ordering around Maria Hill even though SHE is the team leader.  What the hell, Bendis?

And then there’s Simon Williams.  I don’t think I’m giving anything away by telling you Wonder Man goes rogue this issue. (It’s on the cover after all.)   Despite his admittedly cool new look, Wonder Man’s appearance comes off rather ridiculous.   He shows up out of the blue, pick a fight and literally vanishes without a trace.   And then two seconds later another villain shows up without explanation.  So to recap, in two issues time three villains show up in a row, blow up part of Avengers tower and then disappear. (Although technically I don’t know what happens with the last villain.)  No particular reason; they just do.

The Ugly

Avengers seems to be Bendis’ comic version of a Michael Bay film.  And it isn’t the Michael Bay of Bad Boys 2 or Armageddon.  It’s Transformers 2 Bay.   There’s absolutely no character development here.  Despite the presence of bigwigs like Spidey, Captain America, Wolverine and Thor, they all just feel like chess pieces there to be knocked over during the next explosion.  And there is ALWAYS a next explosion.  From what little we see of the plot, I can guess the connecting threads including Wonder Man’s strange change of heart, but isn’t quite enough.

This book has one last issue to impress me.  If all Avengers amounts to is super powered Fight Club, I’m done.

Winner Winner, Chicken Dinner

// June 17th, 2010 // No Comments » // Comics, Review, commentary

If there was a competition between Avengers and New Avengers, NA would be the hands down winner.   There is no question that New Avengers is a better book.

(Writer’s note: from here on in there are one or two spoilers. Reader beware.)

In my review of the adjectiveless- Avengers, I said Brian Michael Bendis needed to step down from writing Earth’s Mightiest Heroes and let some other writer steer the ship.   After reading NA #1, I’ve changed my mind.  Bendis is clearly the man to be writing NA.  After all, it’s his baby.  Bendis had been a big name for some time before he wrote Avengers Dis-assembled, but New Avengers #1 is what cemented him as one of the biggest writers in the industry.

And with good reason. Despite all the missteps over the course of the last volume of NA (wherein it became a repository for any loose plot threads from the Event comic of the week), Bendis and his collaborators (conspirators?) brought prestige back to the Avengers.  Once again these characters were the center of the Marvel Universe.  They were even out-selling X-Men titles.

One of the best things about New Avengers #1 is that it actually feels like it deserved this reboot.  The last volume ended badly with New Avengers Finale.  Bryan Hitch gave us the ugliest comic I’ve seen he drew Captain America Rebirth (… or was that a different comic?). Still, the last volume tied up nicely with the end of the Hood, who was probably the closest thing to the New Avengers having an arch enemy.

Number One starts fresh and clean.   Steve Rogers wants Avengers new and old to come together as a super hero army under the new SHIELD (which for some reason is apparently going to be called Avengers as well, I suppose bc Bendis isn’t very good at naming things).  But when he approaches Luke Cage with this proposition, Cage has a logical retort. Why the hell did they fight the Civil War?!  Why were they on the run from the law for a year being hunted by friends and enemies alike if they were just going to sign up anyway?

Rogers is a great leader and hero, but he’s not very good with explaining things.  His answer amount to {“Uhh… because?}.  Effectively, Rogers thinks its different because he’s in charge now.  Kind of makes you wonder if the whole Civil War was more about Rogers’ ego than the cause of liberty and freedom.

Luke and a few of the others say “no”.  And as an aside, this is strange.  Three of the New Avengers (Spidey, Wolvie and, uhh… Hawkey?) are on both teams.  But if they agree with Cage, that makes no sense.  More on that in a bit.

Tony Stark sells Cage the apparently recently rebuilt Avengers Mansion for a dollar and they’re told they can start their own team.  Again, this doesn’t make a whole lot of sense.  Stark is BROKE.  So 1) how can he afford to rebuild a high tech mansion and 2) what kind of moron sells one of his biggest assets for a dollar??  It’s no wonder this moron lost his corporation.

From there he builds his team.  This is probably my biggest problem with NA.  It’s a good team, but it doesn’t feel solid.  As noted, 3 member serve on both teams, and Wolverine is on like 7 teams.  There’s an amusing moment where they address Logan’s bizarre tendency to be everywhere at once, but I have a better question.  How is this dude not homeless?  He’s fighting half of the Marvel U on any given week.  Where does he get his money?  Do the Avengers pay him to kill people? I bet they do. Whenever Tony needs to get rid of a prostitute, they call Logan. Not cool Steve Rogers; not cool.

…where was I?

Right.  The team seems strangely in-flux.  It’s a minor complaint, but an annoying one. Truthfully, they never fully announce Cage as the new leader.  He seems more like the main character than the man in charge.

One surprising new element is the placement of Victoria Hand.  Rogers, for some unexplained reason, has the most hated woman in the country waiting in Avengers Mansion to let them know she’s their new second in command.  Now, it makes no sense for Rogers to do this without telling Cage and crew beforehand.  It’s like he’s taking over for Ashton Kutcher on MTV’s Punk’d (I’d watch that).  In any case, Hand is presented in the same manner as she was when she worked for Norman Osborn, as the voice of reason.  Again, that’s strange because this woman clearly has worse judgment in people than Nicole Brown Simpson.   But the character is interesting.  I think Bendis wants to redeem Hand the way Fraction redeemed Maria Hill in the pages on Invincible Iron Man.

You may have noticed I seem to be complaining a lot about a book I supposed like.  Well, I’m overly critical.  But I enjoyed the hell out of New Avengers #1.  It’s a solid team book with a great cast and crew.

You may have also noticed than I haven’t said one damn thing about the art.  That’s because all I can really say is that it’s gorgeous.  Stuart Immonen is the man.  That dude could draw my fat ass naked in the shower and show it to potential girlfriends and I would still love him.

Whilst reading, you can’t help but feel Bendis’ affection for this book and the characters. This is clearly a fun book for him and Immonen.  Whereas the regular Avengers title feels like he’s a big kid playing in someone else’s over-sized sandbox, New Avengers is a more natural fit. I look forward to a long run from these two.

Winner winner, chicken dinner.

Peter Parker Isn’t Just Another White Guy

// June 1st, 2010 // 2 Comments » // Comics, Movies, Scifi, commentary

“The last thing Spider-man should be is another white guy.”

There are days when it just doesn’t pay to be a comic fan anymore. That’s the only response I could muster when I read the title of Marc Bernardin’s incredibly insipid and insulting blog post on IO9… well, that and “I’m so glad I don’t read IO9 anymore.”

I debated on even writing a response to this.  Judging by the unintelligible comments that were posted when I took a stand on Ed Brubaker’s completely uniformed and out-right ignorant Captain America story, this is just me stepping back into dog mess.  To hell with it.  Who wants to live forever?

Bernardin makes the argument that the young male actors currently being considered for the role of the Spider-man movie reboot are all boring.  Mostly because they’re white.   He goes on to ask why Spider-man needs to be just another boring white guy.  His justification:

There is no worse argument for anything than, “because that’s the way it’s always been.” Lee and Ditko created a wonderfully strong character, one full of complexity and depth, whohappens to be white. In no way is Peter Parker defined by his whiteness in the same way that too many black characters are defined by their blackness. He’s defined by the people he cares for, by his career, by his identity as a New Yorker (incidentally, one of the most diverse cities in the world) — as too many good people died to prove, a man is defined by his choices, not by the color of his skin.

Oh my.  Where to begin with this sadly disingenuous and poorly though out thesis?  Wait, I know!  The writer’s next question is why can’t Peter Parker be played by a black or hispanic actor?   Well, if it’s racist to assume that Peter Parker has to be white, then isn’t it also racist to assume that the only alternatives to a white actor are black and hispanic?  Not to get off topic, but this has always been my problem with people that fight to include Spanish in signs and textbooks.  Isn’t it just as racist to leave all the other languages and cultures out of the equation?  Not only is it racist, but it’s hypocrisy.   If Peter Parker’s entire history and culture are so interchangeable, then why not look at someone like Jet Li or Naveen Andrews of LOST?  Why jump to only those two ethnicities?  Come on Marc, smell the irony.

But I digress.  Let’s stick with what he’s actually said, not the unintended consequences.

I don’t know what ethnicity Bernardin is, so I won’t assume that he isn’t white. In fact, I would bet he is. Nor will I outright assume that his intent is to cause controversy or harm. I don’t believe it is.  All I really need to know is that he has a problem with perspective.  He sees color far more than he seems to admit.

To say that Peter Parker’s color, and by extension his entire family history have nothing to do with his personality simply because he isn’t black or hispanic is…  mind- blowingly insulting.   I don’t believe anyone is defined by their ethnicity, save those who purposely make it their priority.  But to say that we’re not largely influenced by our ancestry is ridiculous.  First of all, if Peter is Black or Hispanic, so is Aunt May and Uncle Ben.  In the continuity currently used, May and Ben Parker are two old hippies who flourished during the time of the Civil Rights movement.  Their personalities are defined by these times when people learned that you should judge a man and a woman by the content of their character.  A Black May and Ben might have learned the same lessons, but by virtue of the harsh attitudes of the times they would be completely different people, right down to the lessons they taught young Peter.   Furthermore I grew up around people from various different cultures and ethnicities, and I can honestly say a hispanic Peter Parker would be a very different character.  Most hispanics I know strive to carry on the traditions of their family.  Would that really be entirely absent from a Cuban Peter Parker– one whose Aunt and Uncle may have escaped Castro’s boot?  Because the mistake is assuming that we boring white people are just blank slates.  True, I don’t actually know Peter’s specific ancestry.  But for that matter I don’t know my own best friend’s family history. Nor do I ask strangers if they’re Korean or Vietnamese. I don’t need to know that as long as I take the time to find out what kind of person they are.  But by the same token, I certainly don’t assume that you could switch out someone of Chinese descent for someone Japanese.  That upsets them.  It upsets a lot of people, because when you make that assumption you’ve stripped that person of thousands of years of culture and blood and love and life.  You’ve stripped them even of their own mind and actions and singled them down to one thing.  Color.

THAT is racism.

Would it be more interesting to make Peter Parker black/ hispanic/ chinese?  Well, no.  It would just make him different.  Particularly considering Bernardin isn’t arguing to change Parker’s personality, just his skin.   So once again it comes down to the idea that a man’s color defines him.  Kind of makes you wonder what all those people fought and died for over the last 200 years, doesn’t it?

One example brought up was some  uproar over the suggestion some time ago that Will Smith would play Captain America. The suggestion is that a black Cap would be infinitely more interesting than Chris Evans.  A few things about that…  People were also pissed when Smith was floated to play Nick Fury in place of Samuel L. Jackson (one of the most prominent actors on the planet and …oh yeah, a black man).  Speaking for me personally, I was more outraged at the idea of turning Cap into another terrible Will Smith vehicle wherein a patriot in World War 2 mysteriously becomes the Fresh Prince of Belair.   There was an even bigger explosion of hate when Nic Cage was named to play Superman.  The reason being that some actors just don’t work for certain roles, particularly when it comes to icons like Captain America, Superman and even Spider-man. Jack Nicholson was an absolutely terrible Joker.  The Joker is an iconic villain… not an aging playboy who digs the Knicks.

The biggest argument against Smith as Cap actually disproves Bernardin’s point while confirming his statement that a black Captain America is more interesting than white one.  You see two races are not interchangeable.  While we honor brigades of Black soldiers of the greatest generation who fought in the last great war, we are honor-bound to remember that there’s a reason they fought in all black brigades.  Because change takes time, and it most certainly takes sacrifice.  A black Steve Rogers would be a very different story. In fact, it wouldn’t be Rogers’ story at all… it would be Isaiah Bradley’s.   Bernardin makes mention of Kyle Baker’s story The Truth, which exposed a dark chapter in Marvel’s history wherein black men were used as lab rats to test the super soldier serum which Rogers would use to become Captain America.   The sole survivor of these experiments was Isaiah Bradley, the black Cap… the original.  But the military wouldn’t have accepted a black symbol for their country, so Bradley’s existence was hidden away for decades.  That is far more interesting story than the one about Steve Rogers.  But isn’t the story of Captain America.  In fact, if anything it makes one feel less patriotic.  And it isn’t Bradley’s skin that makes him more interesting than Steve… it’s his pain.  His story.   And it’s a story worth telling in a different film.

To say that we shouldn’t change things simply because that’s the way it’s always been is foolish, this is true.  Change is both necessary and natural.  But that statement is a generalization.  Change for the sake of change is what Bernardin is arguing.  See, I don’t give a damn what color Peter Parker is.  I didn’t even particularly like the previous Spider-man films, mostly because Tobey Macguire was so wooden and completely out of his element.  But I don’t think his “whiteness” is what made him suck.  If you were to argue that Daniel Dae Kim would make a better Peter than Nick Lachey I might see your point… hell I’d take Kim over a whole litany of actors on just about anything. (“Yes, the shark from Jaws.”) But that’s the whole crux of the issue.  Bernardin isn’t suggesting actual actors that could fill the role.   He’s not choosing Michael Clarke Duncan over Vader (former WWF westler) to play Kingpin.  He’s just saying throw any random hispanic actor in that spot and it’ll be better.

See that title gets me. “The last thing Spider-man should be is another white guy.”  The last thing.  Why?  Is his whiteness really the problem with translating the character to screen?  Doubtful.  Instead, the point seems to be to change him to make race an issue.  ”Go see the new Turkish Spider-man!  Did ya here?  He’s not white anymore!  HUZZAH!”  I mentioned Michael Clark Duncan as the choice for Kingpin in the Daredevil movie.   I didn’t have a single problem with him there.  He was the right man for the job.  That’s fine.  Colorblind acting is great when you choose the best person possible.  But the way his article comes across is less colorblind casting and more cinematic affirmative action.  If you believe in that, fine. Let’s have that discussion. But don’t pretend this somehow makes us a gentler, more tolerant nation.  Instead it politicizes the issue and once again divides us according to typical Hollywood standards.

Arguing Will Smith over Chris Evans is easy (actually it’s not; they’re both terrible).  It’s also a debate with merit.  Arguing white versus red, black, brown, yellow… it’s just a step back. It’s a step on the backs of everyone who ever fought or died to be recognized as a person and not just a color. It’s politics.  And it’s dismissive.  People… even fictional ones… deserve better.

Avengers #1: Maybe Give Someone Else a Turn…

// May 25th, 2010 // No Comments » // Comics, Humor, Review, commentary

courtesy of Monty of Welcome to Border City

I’m neither a Bendis hater nor apologist.  I think BMB does some fantastic work (Ultimate Spider-man) and some shitty work (Ult. Comics Spider-man).  His stylized pause- and- comma- after- every- other- word dialogue doesn’t bother me. (Well, sometimes it bothers me.)   In fact he has done more than a few books that I loved, including the recent miniseries Siege.

But after 7 years of running the Avengers (and somewhat by extension, the entire Marvel Universe), I think maybe he needs to take a break.

Avengers #1 reboots the franchise for something like the fourth time since Avengers Disassembled, this time under the new Heroic Age.  That’s a lot damn reboots.  In fact, if you look at Bendis’ acclaimed New Avengers, its hard to see the book as an actual series rather an intermediary between event books.   Now New Avengers itself will be rebooting and continuing on in June — curiously with the exact same creative team it had before.

The main series, The (adjective-less) Avengers seems to replace Mighty Avengers as the one true Avengers under the helm of Bendis and Marvel legend John Romita jr.

JRjr is one of my favorite pencilers.  Honestly, I just think he’s brilliant.  And as one of Marvel’s best, it makes sense to relaunch their premier super-team with him on art.

So if I like Bendis and I like Romita, what’s the problem?

Avengers #1 bores the shit out of me.

Sorry, but there it is.

Despite the talents of these creators, neither brings their A-game and they never manage to bring it together in an interesting way.   For all intents and purposes this is just your average “getting the band together” issue, filled with quasi-philosphical speeches by Steve Rogers.   There’s nothing necessarily wrong with that, but it hardly merits the pomp an circumstance that Marvel is putting into it.

When Bendis wrote Avengers Re-Assembled nearly a decade ago, he actually came up with a story to justify putting together a new team.  Did Captain America’s reasoning on this make any sense or manage to explain why they needed New Avengers instead of the old ones?   No.  Not even slightly. It still doesn’t make sense.   But at least he tried.  This time it feels more like someone bowled a strike and the machine is simply re-stacking the pins.  It’s so routine, why bother?

Also, the new team itself doesn’t feel new at all. Instead it feels like Bendis is trying to convince you that you’re seeing something new.  It’s as if he’s a shitty hypnotist waving his hands eerily at you and repeating “you’re feeling sleepy” in melodic tones.  This Avengers team is almost exactly like the New Avengers teams, plus Thor and Hawkeye from the old Avengers teams.   Oh and Cap and Steve are having the exact same conversation they’ve been having since the 60′s.   And no one wants to read about that.  Everyone knows a pair of friends that argues all the time about stupid shit just because that’s what they do.  But most of the time you aren’t forced to listen to it.  In fact you’d probably tell them to shut the hell up after a while.

Another cast member with obvious problems is Spider-man.  I’ve always contended that it makes sense for Peter to be on the team, since he’s had more experience than any hero save Cap and Wolverine.  The problem is Bendis doesn’t seem to know how to separate Ultimate Spider-man from the 616 version.  In Ult. Spider-man, a title Bendis has written for a decade now, Peter is still a teenage boy and relatively new to being a hero.   In the regular Marvel Universe, Peter is a grown man.  He’s unlikely to be easily shocked when Thor blows a villain through a window, because frankly he’s fought alongside Thor for years.  And yet when that happens, he acts like I would if I were 12 and just met Bruce Willis (which is to say, I might pee my pants… hypothetically).   It’s kind of an issue for a main character.

Spider-man, Spider-man... sandwiched between Thor and Iron Man... is he strong, listen bud...

There is one major change to the cast, and that is the leadership of Maria Hill.  Steve Rogers chose her because IT’S SHOCKING she was the best “man” for the job.   Now, I might point out that Steve Rogers has no way of knowing this since he died right after she became the temporary head of SHIELD, a job which she admitted to being completely wrong for in a scene Bendis himself wrote.  I might also point out that Maria Hill has constantly proven herself inept in superhuman situations and isn’t all that good at leading people.  I might point that out, but really- why bother?

Now as to the art… remember what I said about loving John Romita?  That’s only about half true.  I love about half of his work.  I was absolutely floored by books like his Amazing Spider-man run with J. Michael Straczynski, his X-Men work with Chris Claremont  and even World War Hulk.   Hell, one of my very first comics was the last chapter of Armor Wars 2 in Invincible Iron Man.  But then he goes and does something like The Sentry miniseries.   A lot of JRjr’s worst work is easily (though not totally) attributable to the inker.  Romita is someone who absolutely requires an inker with a lighter style.  When paired with an inker with a heavy hand, like oh, say… Klaus Janson, his panels come out dark, splotchy and really, really ugly.

So three guesses who they paired him with?

Now I’m not insulting Janson.  The man is a legendary inker (in as much as inkers are legends), having worked on a litany of high profile projects, including Frank Miller’s Dardevil run and The Dark Knight Returns.   This man can ink the hell out of a comic.  But he’s just a bad choice to pair with Romita.  I know that’s ironic since Romita is the main person he is paired with besides Miller, but it’s true.

Why so serious?

And again, it’s not totally Janson’s fault either.  Iron Man looks fucking terrible.  IRON MAN.  A character Romita has drawn for years.   The new armor was designed to look more organic.  Unfortunately Romita can’t seem to wrap his head around that, and each panel he appears in makes I.M. look like a bulky monstrosity.  Plus, the mouth piece always seems to look like Heath Ledger’s face in The Dark Knight.  I don’t know why.

And then there are more than a few panels that look incredibly rushed.  The panel that introduces Maria Hill, for example.   Between the artist, the inker and the colorist, Maria Hill has never looked worse.  In fact I think they drew her as a black woman.   Hill has always been designed as a fair-skinned hispanic woman with graceful features.  Ethnicity aside, in her short appearance in Avengers, she looks like she should be working in an oil refinery.

Which actually brings up a good question.  Where the hell did she go in this book?  As soon as the villain shows up, the entire cast faces him and makes a decision about what they’re going to do next.  Steve and Iron Man are throwing commands left and right.  So what happened to the woman Steve selected to lead them?  Shouldn’t she be involved?

The book isn’t a total waste.  The premise of the story, a time- travel adventure is suitably wacky and a very old school Avengers thing to do.  It’s kind of bizarre that Bendis chose to base his initial arc on a poorly-sold direct-to-DVD animated children’s film.  Maybe it’s a marketing ploy to get me to rent the movie.  (It’s working.)  Still, I’m a sucker for future apocalypse stories, so I’m in long enough to see how that plays out.

The villains intrigue me, even if they couldn’t resist putting Ultron (an overused villain of late) in it somewhat.  And I like the idea of Wonder Man just being randomly crazy.

If this was just a random issue in a story, it would probably get decent marks.  But these days the big two comic companies will use any excuse to print a new #1 issue (Wolverine’s title along has seen 3 in the last decade), and as a fan I say enough is enough.  If you’re going to reboot a book, there better be a damned good reason or an absolutely stunning story.  Otherwise you’re just exacerbating the exhaustion fans have been feeling for the last 5 years or so.  Are we really that far away from the decadence that blew the market in the 90s?

Get with it, Marvel.  And maybe after this story is over… maybe it’s time to actually try something different and give a new writer a shot at the Avengers.  Bendis can focus on the other 18 titles he writes.

He Is Iron Man

// May 8th, 2010 // No Comments » // Comics, Movies, Nerdgasm, Review, commentary

There’s nothing quite like making a sequel to a popular and successful film.  The goal of the sequel is to re-create the same feelings in  the audience that the first film made, but at the same time create something entirely new and not just a re-tread.  Audiences can be brutal when it comes to sequels and beloved franchises.  To coin a phrase, they actually do expect you to re-invent the wheel.

Sometimes an audience’s inability to detach the first film from the second can severely hamper their response. Having read several negative advanced reviews of Iron Man 2, I think maybe this is yet another sequel to suffer from this problem.  The first Iron Man movie was, in my opinion, the best comic adaptation thus far made.  Though it’s spotlight was partially stolen by The Dark Knight, the story of Tony Stark managed to strike a chord with audiences.  Both Tony and Bruce Wayne (Batman) are similar characters in many ways, but whereas Bruce’s adventures on screen thrilled us and chilled us, Tony charmed the pants off of us– in the case of some young ladies, quite literally.

While it is far from a perfect film, the further adventures of Iron Man are even more (if you’ll pardon the pun) incredible.  The first film managed to overcome the typical slow-burning superhero origin story that hampers so many adaptations. (This problem practically crushed M Night Shyamalan’s plans for an Unbreakable trilogy.)   Iron Man 2 literally jumps right into the action almost from the first frame, as Iron Man jumps from a military transport- for some reason- and lands on a stage at Stark Expo 2010.  From there the film begins a race against time that will either lead to a drunk and well-bedded Tony Stark- or a dead one.

That isn’t much of an exaggeration; this is a busy film. One of the critics I read likened it to the mess that was Spider-man 3, which played out like a stack of comics in a blender and glued together by a chimpanzee. It’s not really a fair comparison. The problem there wasn’t so much the number of plot points dealt with, but the lack of any connection between them.   Though IM2 deals with many seemingly unrelated details (Pepper Potts, Congress, Justin Hammer, Whiplash, SHIELD, Rhodey and Scarlet Johansson’s spectacular ass) each of them gets plenty of time to settle in and meshes cohesively in the film.   I stress the first part. The pace of the film is fast, but the plot is never rushed.

I credit this both to a strong script by Justin Theroux and expert direction by co-star Jon Favreau.  Had either of these men been inadequate I’m quite certain I would be screaming bloody murder right now.

But the real element that pulls it all together in my opinion is the man inside the armor.  Once upon a time Tom Cruise was signed to become the armored Avenger.   While I personally consider Mr. Cruise to be one of the finest actors ever to worship space aliens, I can only imagine that movie experience would have led to me kicking a puppy.   The loss of Cruise as the film’s lead ultimately led to the great Robert Downey Jr taking over as Tony Stark.   If there’s anything above perfect casting, then casting RDJ as Tony is Mana from heaven.    No actor has so completely personified a role since the day Christopher Reeve made us believe a man could fly.

It’s nothing as simple as looking the part.  Nor is it even necessarily the fact that Tony Stark is well-known as an alcoholic and Robert Downey has had his own well-publicized battle with addiction and redemption.   It’s the nuances.   The ability to make impossibly inappropriate jokes and then switch to devout seriousness without missing a beat.   The unflappable facade he holds even when he’s falling apart.  And yes, there is the charm.   In the Marvel Universe, there are basically 3 men who are as well known for the sexual conquests as their heroic exploits.  Both Daredevil and Wolverine are notorious skirt chasers.  Tony puts them both to shame.  The aspect of the film version I find most intriguing is that women don’t sleep with Tony because he’s a famous billionaire, they do it because he’s just that good.  To put it simply, there’s a small chance I’d go gay for RDJ.   Don’t judge me.

But of course, no man is an island.  The rest of the cast provides a strong base -and occasional foil- for the Iron Man.  I wasn’t necessarily a big supporter of Gwyneth Paltrow as Pepper Potts, despite a strong performance.  But after two films, I feel like she’s added to a character who wasn’t all that celebrated outside of hardcore Iron Man fans.   Jon Favreau returns as Happy Hogan, Tony’s driver.  This time though, he exists as more than just a prop.   Happy even gets a few fight scenes this time around.   Don Cheadle -one of my favorite actors- serves admirably as Rhodey, though the shift from Terrence Howard is a little distracting.

And of Scarlet Johansson, I will merely echo Tony’s thoughts.  I want one.

technically this has nothing to do with Iron Man, but... holy shit.

Then there’s the new villains.

Jeff Bridges is a difficult act to follow.   Thankfully they didn’t just try to follow Obadiah Stane with Sam Rockwell’s Justin Hammer.  While Rockwell is always entertainingly weird, his nerdy wanna-be-Tony Stark has yet to feel menacing (…yet).   And yet Mickey Rourke manages to bring a whole new level of crazy into the Iron Man universe.    Though to be fair, I’m pretty sure Rooney was just playing himself with a Russian accent.   Most people were confused by Rooney’s announcement as the movie’s main villain.  Whiplash is a rather obscure nemesis, even among comic fans.  Having teased the villain known as the Mandarin in the first film, Ivan Vanko seemed like a huge let down.   And yet it turned out better than I could have anticipated.

To further address the negative press, there’s something you have to understand about this film.   I think a lot of the confusion revolves around the drastically different tone this time around.  Iron Man 1 was about a man figuring out who he wants to be.  IM2 is about that man trying to do too much at once only to slowly fall apart.

It’s a much darker film in spite of the laughs and unbelievable action scenes.   In fact this may be as close as we ever come to the “Demon in a bottle” storyline which dealt with Tony’s alcoholism. The filmmakers have danced around and teased the subject, but honestly– who goes to an action flick looking to see a guy nearly die of liver failure?   Here we get the best of both worlds.  Many of the same control issues that alcoholics face are dealt with as Tony faces the dangers of his own ego.  Sure it’s on a less realistic and heavy level, but again that’s not what you’re going to an Iron Man film to see. Save the complex life issues for the comics, which have the space to deal with them.   The movies work better on these smaller scales.

The final verdict-   Iron Man 2: go for the Iron Man/War Machine fight scenes, stay for the uncomfortable Scarlet Johansson erections.

My Apologies to Joe Quesada

// April 20th, 2010 // No Comments » // Comics, commentary

A couple of months ago I wrote a response to Ed Brubaker’s politically uneducated issue of Captain America involving the Tea Parties.  I also wrote a response to Joe Quesada’s defense of the issue.  Both of which were fairly reasonable.  I wasn’t pissed at Ed Brubaker for his opinions.  I simply question the judgment of publishing a comic that insults at least 50% of your audience, particularly in an industry currently struggling the way comics has been.  Resultantly I decided I would no longer buy comics made by Ed Brubaker.  I wasn’t calling for others to do so.  Make your own decision.  This was a personal decision.

But I digress.

This all led to a handful of idiots trying to “one-up” me.  None of them could really out-argue me or even make a coherent point.  But that wasn’t what they were trying to do.  They were just being assholes.  The point was to make me angry.  And in that they failed.  They made me sad.  I had always thought of my fellow geeks as reasonable people.  Geeks generally grow up as outcasts.   Many of them grow up being attacked by “normal” people.  So for whatever reason- call it naivete- I expected better of my fellow geeks than unwarranted attacks.

And I was wrong.

That all led me to thinking about being a blogger.   I’m not sure I want to be one.  The internet, at its base, is a tool to connect people.  Its not about information anymore than a car is about gasoline.  Its about feeling like you’re connected to the world, even when you’re too afraid to step out from behind a keyboard.   But a percentage– far too many– of the people in this community use it as an excuse to make cowardly attacks on others.  They can’t defend their words.  They won’t even try.  They just snipe at you.  It’s like those kids in high school that wait until your back is turned and whisper under their breath.  Their ego conflicts with their feelings of inferiority.  And because of this, the internet isn’t always this place of wonder where you can find connections, humor and maybe even friendship and love.  Sometimes it’s just toxic.

I’ve always tried to stand by my words. If I talk smack about you, I’m not afraid of you hearing it.  I won’t be a coward about it.

But today I realized that maybe that’s not enough.   Two days ago I wrote an article condemning Marvel EIC Joe Quesada for once again committing what I feel is an insult to fans.   I was pretty harsh.  Was it as mean as I could have been? No.   But it was uncalled for.   Joe may not have been displaying the best judgment lately, but he’s hardly Darkseid (err, Mephisto I guess?).   He’s just a geek like us trying to do the best job he can.   So if by chance he should read this, I am sorry Joe.   I’ll try to be better from now on.

I keep thinking about something Glenn Beck likes to say.

Be the person you were on 9/12.

It’s a good thought.  But I’ll go a step further. Be the person you always wanted to be. Be better.  Don’t accept yourself as less than anything.  You don’t have to be rich or daring or dynamic.  Just be a better person.  Try.

Annnnnnnnyway.  That’s my soapbox.