Archive for Scifi

“Is that the same as ‘getting a lot’?”

// August 24th, 2010 // No Comments » // Humor, Scifi, Television

Apparently some folks made a video summarizing True Blood, called “True Blood in 60 seconds”.  Bizarrely, the video seems to actually run almost 2 minutes.  Seems like calling it “True in 2″ would have been a little catchier.  Anyway, it’s pretty funny and voices my thoughts on the show precisely.  Which is to say:

1) The vampires as allegory for homosexuals concept is so ham-fisted I’m not sure what the point is.  I think it kind of makes gay people look like assholes.

and 2) True Blood is a show for people too chicken shit to admit they want to watch movies where people fuck.

I’ve tried watching episodes of the show, including the first four (which were curiously major cock teases).  I don’t care what anyone says, that show is pure shit.  And this is from someone who’s seen every episode of Dawson’s Creek and at least 12 episodes of The Gilmore Girls.

The last episode I saw featured the main guy on the show, Bill, raping/ pleasing a female vampire.  And by raping/ pleasing, I mean twisting her head completely around so that he’s getting her missionary while her head is looking back at the camera screaming “FUCK ME FUCK ME FUCK ME”.  And to make matters worse, we didn’t even get to see her tits.

I don’t know what kinda sick fuck came up with that, but if ever there was a Charles Manson motherfucker who needed Jesus, it’s him.

Oh and then there’s this.

Blood in the pink, one in the stink?

Look… I’m far from what anyone would call a “prude”.  There’s a good chance I’d be willing to switch places with one of these guys if that’s how Sookie likes to get down.  But I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t want to be walking around Barnes and Noble with my nephew where this shit is is casually displayed next to Better Homes and Gardens, then spend the ride home trying to explain away “double penetration” to a 9 year old.  Because I don’t think he’s gonna buy “they’re just playing Twister with ketchup”.

True Blood sucks ass. And judging by the cover, it sucks a lot of dick too.

*video courtesy of Mashable

***if you’re wondering, the title is from an old Newsradio line.  John Ritter is explaining that he suffers from nymphomania/ sexual addiction.  Dave Foley responds: “Sir I’m from Wisconsin. Is that the same as “gettin’ a lot?”

1984

// August 17th, 2010 // No Comments » // Scifi, commentary

This isn’t news.  This is a rant.  But I think it’s an important one.

A couple weeks ago I read a story (don’t recall where) about a young woman.  She was sitting at a restaurant eating dinner, and the waiter came to her and told her she had a phone call.   Confused, she picked up the phone.  A strange voice said {Maybe you shouldn’t make it so easy to find you?}.

Creepy, huh?  But the stranger had a point.  See, she was using foursquare.  Foursquare is a service that uses your phone’s GPS to track you and “check-in” wherever you are.  If you check in to a particular place like your favorite restaurant enough times, you are declared the Mayor of that place.   Some companies, such as Starbucks, offer rewards to Foursquare customers and Mayors.   It’s the latest craze in social networking, currently referred to as “geo-location”.  Twitter has recently adopted geo-location, and if mashable is to be believed (and they probably are), Facebook will soon adopt the technology.

I can’t tell you how frustrating this is to hear.  The concept of “Big Brother” has long been a trope of science fiction, always as the villain.  Most people look at George Orwell’s novel very superficially.  1984 was about a fascist world where the government controls everything.  Except it wasn’t.   Orwell envisioned a world where freedom didn’t exist.    Big Brother was just an analogy.   The real villain is the loss of self-determination.  And the scary part is, we’re almost there.

See, I’m like you.  I’m addicted to the internet. I have a blog.  I go on facebook.  I share pictures, thoughts, frustrations… my whole life.  I cast my world out into the ocean.  But as the saying goes, when you enter the ocean, you enter the food chain.  As you share your whole life with the world, you give them all they need to know.    It wasn’t hard for the stranger to track that woman down in the restaurant.  Her profile is online. He pulled up a picture of her that she posted.  Foursquare told him where she was.  All he had to do was describe her to the waiter.   Stalking at the push of a button, without ever having to leave your couch.

You see, another trope of fiction is that when you give someone your name, you give them power over you.

We’re giving up out freedom little by little. How can you truly be free when you can always be found.  Geo-location is like an artificial cage, one of our own design.

Big Brother is already here.   But it didn’t take our world by force.  We just hand it over every day.  The world doesn’t need to track us; we tell them where we are!  We give them our name!  We do it gladly.  And the sad truth of it is that its simply because we’re lonely.  On a hard day, there’s nothing as satisfying as someone re-tweeting your joke on Twitter.   When someone leaves a comment on a photo telling you that you’re beautiful, it feels like love.  And every time someone tells you that they loved that short story you posted on myspace… just for a second, you believe you could make your dreams of being a writer come true.  If only you would log off and try to get published.

Of course it’s easier on the internet.  And it’s all a lie.  Or perhaps more accurately a perversion of the truth.

We need to stop living our lives online.  At least not totally.  The internet is a powerful tool that gives even the quietest among us a voice.  But it can also be a cage.   They don’t need to know where you are all of the time.  Don’t give them that power.  And don’t give them your name.

The LOST Epilogue is Bullshit

// August 9th, 2010 // No Comments » // Nerdgasm, Review, Rumor, Scifi, Television

So at some point the 12 minute epilogue to LOST (the one that producers Cuse and Lindelof implied would finally give some fucking answers) was leaked online.  It was quickly taken down in most places bc they want you to buy the DVD sets in order to watch it.

I managed to watch it here.  Go watch it now because it will be taken down, probably soon.  I’m not embedding it here, bc I don’t want the hassle.

Honestly, the whole thing was another major dick move by the LOST crew.  Of the 12 minutes they give you, 6 of them were another Dharma Initiative film which explained where the Polar Bears come from.  I think we can all agree, of the dangling plot threads left, the polar bear mystery was one of the least necessary for them to answer.  The last 3 minutes of it are by far the most interesting, and all they really do it tease you with good shit then tell you to kiss their ass, bc you’ll never see it.

Fuck the DVD set.   They should have just let the show end with the finale rather than be assholes about it.

(PS if its taken down by the time you read this, the only good part of the video should be up on Topless Robot.)

Like a Fish…

// July 23rd, 2010 // No Comments » // Movies, Nerdgasm, Rumor, Scifi, commentary

Rob Bricken from Topless Robot posted the following video. (who I guess got it from /film)

Tron Legacy Viral at Comic-Con: Year 2 from /Film on Vimeo.

I generally avoid reposting other people’s shit because sometimes it feels like the internet is just one big circle jerk.  But this video was far too awesome not to comment on.

Over at SDCC this year, Disney decided to re-create Flynn’s Arcade in anticipation of the upcoming Tron Legacy film this December.  But as you can see in the video, they didn’t just make an arcade.  They re-created the computer than downloads you into the cyber world and then sent guests into a room that looks like the fucking Tron world to watch kick ass clips of the movie and hang out with fucking Bruce Boxleitner.

All I can say is that it’s a damn good thing I couldn’t afford to go to San Diego bc I would’ve killed a shitload of nerds and sown their skin into a piecemeal human suit to get into this thing. Holy fuck.  Bruce.  Fucking.  Boxleitner. He’s John Sheridan. And Capt. Awesome’s dad on Chuck. Which makes him Admiral Awesome, I think.  And he looks cool as shit, taking pictures with fans.  I bet he could nail every chick in that room (all 6 of them) if he wanted.

There’s been some rumors that Disney is thinking of putting Flynn’s Arcade in Tomorrowland (not sure if it’s Disneyland or Disney World).  If this is what they did for a road show, there’s a very good chance the Imagineers are building something capable of causing mass brain aneurysms.

If Tron Legacy is a tenth as good as the trailer, I’m going to go to jail for public indecency when I see it.

NERD RANT: Kingdom Hearts

// June 16th, 2010 // 1 Comment » // Nerdgasm, Scifi, commentary

This is why I hate video games.

I am a Kingdom Hearts nut! I freaking LOVE KH 1 & 2. I seriously play these games about every 4-6 months in eager anticipation of the arrival of Kingdom Hearts 3, which at this point seems like I’ll be playing in an old folks home. So Disney and Square Enix have decided to break up the long wait for this eagerly anticipated game by dicking with their customers.

3 games are being released this year. One is a mobile phone game called Coded. I wouldn’t mind playing it, but I’m okay if I never do. The second is the recently released 358/2 which tells the story of Roxas during the time between KH1 and 2. Again, I would really like to play it, but it isn’t killing me. The other game, Birth by Sleep is a Prequel to KH1. Initially I was mildly curious about this one, but since it starred an entirely new cast, I was ambiguous about the announcement.

Then they released the trailer (posted above).

It looks good.  It looks damn good.  It looks so good I want this game to have my electronic babies who I will then train to fight mini- Keyblade Wars.

So now that we have a real sequel (well… prequel) to the game I love so much, why am I pissed?

BECAUSE I CAN’T FUCKING PLAY IT!

In their infinite wisdom, Disney and Square Enix have decided not to release these games on the Playstation 2.   Instead, 358/2 was released on the portable Nintendo DS and Birth by Sleep comes out in September to the PSP!   WHAT THE FUCK????

Kingdom Hearts fans are rabid!  Why on Earth would the game makers want to piss them off and lose business from those that don’t have a PSP?  I’ll tell you why; this is a case of forcing the buyer to purchase the hog when you only want the bacon.  The PSP isn’t the most popular gaming system.  It has it’s fans, but serious gamers primarily use next-gen systems (PS3, X-Box 360) and kids go for the Wii and the DS.  So put a guaranteed hit on the PSP and that should drive up sales.  Except why the fuck should I spend over a hundred bucks on a PSP plus the price of the game just to play the ONE GAME.  That’s all I want!  Birth by Sleep!  Fuck the other games on the system!

Not to mention the fact that when KH3 comes out, it will almost certainly be exclusive to next-gen systems so I will finally have to purchase a PS3.  Okay.  I accept that.  But at least there are a bunch of other games I’d like to play on the PS3.  NOT JUST THE ONE.

Fuck you Square Enix.  This is horse-shit.  Whoever made this decision is a bag of dick.

Peter Parker Isn’t Just Another White Guy

// June 1st, 2010 // 2 Comments » // Comics, Movies, Scifi, commentary

“The last thing Spider-man should be is another white guy.”

There are days when it just doesn’t pay to be a comic fan anymore. That’s the only response I could muster when I read the title of Marc Bernardin’s incredibly insipid and insulting blog post on IO9… well, that and “I’m so glad I don’t read IO9 anymore.”

I debated on even writing a response to this.  Judging by the unintelligible comments that were posted when I took a stand on Ed Brubaker’s completely uniformed and out-right ignorant Captain America story, this is just me stepping back into dog mess.  To hell with it.  Who wants to live forever?

Bernardin makes the argument that the young male actors currently being considered for the role of the Spider-man movie reboot are all boring.  Mostly because they’re white.   He goes on to ask why Spider-man needs to be just another boring white guy.  His justification:

There is no worse argument for anything than, “because that’s the way it’s always been.” Lee and Ditko created a wonderfully strong character, one full of complexity and depth, whohappens to be white. In no way is Peter Parker defined by his whiteness in the same way that too many black characters are defined by their blackness. He’s defined by the people he cares for, by his career, by his identity as a New Yorker (incidentally, one of the most diverse cities in the world) — as too many good people died to prove, a man is defined by his choices, not by the color of his skin.

Oh my.  Where to begin with this sadly disingenuous and poorly though out thesis?  Wait, I know!  The writer’s next question is why can’t Peter Parker be played by a black or hispanic actor?   Well, if it’s racist to assume that Peter Parker has to be white, then isn’t it also racist to assume that the only alternatives to a white actor are black and hispanic?  Not to get off topic, but this has always been my problem with people that fight to include Spanish in signs and textbooks.  Isn’t it just as racist to leave all the other languages and cultures out of the equation?  Not only is it racist, but it’s hypocrisy.   If Peter Parker’s entire history and culture are so interchangeable, then why not look at someone like Jet Li or Naveen Andrews of LOST?  Why jump to only those two ethnicities?  Come on Marc, smell the irony.

But I digress.  Let’s stick with what he’s actually said, not the unintended consequences.

I don’t know what ethnicity Bernardin is, so I won’t assume that he isn’t white. In fact, I would bet he is. Nor will I outright assume that his intent is to cause controversy or harm. I don’t believe it is.  All I really need to know is that he has a problem with perspective.  He sees color far more than he seems to admit.

To say that Peter Parker’s color, and by extension his entire family history have nothing to do with his personality simply because he isn’t black or hispanic is…  mind- blowingly insulting.   I don’t believe anyone is defined by their ethnicity, save those who purposely make it their priority.  But to say that we’re not largely influenced by our ancestry is ridiculous.  First of all, if Peter is Black or Hispanic, so is Aunt May and Uncle Ben.  In the continuity currently used, May and Ben Parker are two old hippies who flourished during the time of the Civil Rights movement.  Their personalities are defined by these times when people learned that you should judge a man and a woman by the content of their character.  A Black May and Ben might have learned the same lessons, but by virtue of the harsh attitudes of the times they would be completely different people, right down to the lessons they taught young Peter.   Furthermore I grew up around people from various different cultures and ethnicities, and I can honestly say a hispanic Peter Parker would be a very different character.  Most hispanics I know strive to carry on the traditions of their family.  Would that really be entirely absent from a Cuban Peter Parker– one whose Aunt and Uncle may have escaped Castro’s boot?  Because the mistake is assuming that we boring white people are just blank slates.  True, I don’t actually know Peter’s specific ancestry.  But for that matter I don’t know my own best friend’s family history. Nor do I ask strangers if they’re Korean or Vietnamese. I don’t need to know that as long as I take the time to find out what kind of person they are.  But by the same token, I certainly don’t assume that you could switch out someone of Chinese descent for someone Japanese.  That upsets them.  It upsets a lot of people, because when you make that assumption you’ve stripped that person of thousands of years of culture and blood and love and life.  You’ve stripped them even of their own mind and actions and singled them down to one thing.  Color.

THAT is racism.

Would it be more interesting to make Peter Parker black/ hispanic/ chinese?  Well, no.  It would just make him different.  Particularly considering Bernardin isn’t arguing to change Parker’s personality, just his skin.   So once again it comes down to the idea that a man’s color defines him.  Kind of makes you wonder what all those people fought and died for over the last 200 years, doesn’t it?

One example brought up was some  uproar over the suggestion some time ago that Will Smith would play Captain America. The suggestion is that a black Cap would be infinitely more interesting than Chris Evans.  A few things about that…  People were also pissed when Smith was floated to play Nick Fury in place of Samuel L. Jackson (one of the most prominent actors on the planet and …oh yeah, a black man).  Speaking for me personally, I was more outraged at the idea of turning Cap into another terrible Will Smith vehicle wherein a patriot in World War 2 mysteriously becomes the Fresh Prince of Belair.   There was an even bigger explosion of hate when Nic Cage was named to play Superman.  The reason being that some actors just don’t work for certain roles, particularly when it comes to icons like Captain America, Superman and even Spider-man. Jack Nicholson was an absolutely terrible Joker.  The Joker is an iconic villain… not an aging playboy who digs the Knicks.

The biggest argument against Smith as Cap actually disproves Bernardin’s point while confirming his statement that a black Captain America is more interesting than white one.  You see two races are not interchangeable.  While we honor brigades of Black soldiers of the greatest generation who fought in the last great war, we are honor-bound to remember that there’s a reason they fought in all black brigades.  Because change takes time, and it most certainly takes sacrifice.  A black Steve Rogers would be a very different story. In fact, it wouldn’t be Rogers’ story at all… it would be Isaiah Bradley’s.   Bernardin makes mention of Kyle Baker’s story The Truth, which exposed a dark chapter in Marvel’s history wherein black men were used as lab rats to test the super soldier serum which Rogers would use to become Captain America.   The sole survivor of these experiments was Isaiah Bradley, the black Cap… the original.  But the military wouldn’t have accepted a black symbol for their country, so Bradley’s existence was hidden away for decades.  That is far more interesting story than the one about Steve Rogers.  But isn’t the story of Captain America.  In fact, if anything it makes one feel less patriotic.  And it isn’t Bradley’s skin that makes him more interesting than Steve… it’s his pain.  His story.   And it’s a story worth telling in a different film.

To say that we shouldn’t change things simply because that’s the way it’s always been is foolish, this is true.  Change is both necessary and natural.  But that statement is a generalization.  Change for the sake of change is what Bernardin is arguing.  See, I don’t give a damn what color Peter Parker is.  I didn’t even particularly like the previous Spider-man films, mostly because Tobey Macguire was so wooden and completely out of his element.  But I don’t think his “whiteness” is what made him suck.  If you were to argue that Daniel Dae Kim would make a better Peter than Nick Lachey I might see your point… hell I’d take Kim over a whole litany of actors on just about anything. (“Yes, the shark from Jaws.”) But that’s the whole crux of the issue.  Bernardin isn’t suggesting actual actors that could fill the role.   He’s not choosing Michael Clarke Duncan over Vader (former WWF westler) to play Kingpin.  He’s just saying throw any random hispanic actor in that spot and it’ll be better.

See that title gets me. “The last thing Spider-man should be is another white guy.”  The last thing.  Why?  Is his whiteness really the problem with translating the character to screen?  Doubtful.  Instead, the point seems to be to change him to make race an issue.  ”Go see the new Turkish Spider-man!  Did ya here?  He’s not white anymore!  HUZZAH!”  I mentioned Michael Clark Duncan as the choice for Kingpin in the Daredevil movie.   I didn’t have a single problem with him there.  He was the right man for the job.  That’s fine.  Colorblind acting is great when you choose the best person possible.  But the way his article comes across is less colorblind casting and more cinematic affirmative action.  If you believe in that, fine. Let’s have that discussion. But don’t pretend this somehow makes us a gentler, more tolerant nation.  Instead it politicizes the issue and once again divides us according to typical Hollywood standards.

Arguing Will Smith over Chris Evans is easy (actually it’s not; they’re both terrible).  It’s also a debate with merit.  Arguing white versus red, black, brown, yellow… it’s just a step back. It’s a step on the backs of everyone who ever fought or died to be recognized as a person and not just a color. It’s politics.  And it’s dismissive.  People… even fictional ones… deserve better.

LOST: Why The End was both awesome and complete bullshit

// May 24th, 2010 // 2 Comments » // Nerdgasm, Review, Scifi, Television, commentary

There is nothing I can say that's funnier than the look on Charlie's face.

The End has come and gone.

Even if you weren’t a fan, it’s hard to deny that one of the most significant shows on television just passed.   The nerdiest show around has left an indelible impression on thousands of people across the world, leaving in its wake a challenge to other shows that will likely be unmet for a long, long time.

Okay so poetic ramblings dispensed, its clear I liked LOST.  So what’s up with the article title? Why did I call The End complete bullshit?

Well, because quite frankly though I consider LOST’s finale to be one of the best series closers I’ve ever seen, it was essentially 2.5 hours of sleight of hand.   The writers and producers of LOST spent so much time thrilling you and warming your heart, that you may have failed to notice they didn’t actually answer many questions, and the main one they did answer makes absolutely no sense.  For a show that’s main appeal is it’s mysteries and mythology, that’s either a really funny joke or incredibly fucked up. Sure, you were never going to get all the answers in a cohesive story (the reasoning of the numbers for instance), but I actually thought they would answer a few.

In truth, the finale actually posed more questions for me.  And that I think is very appropriate. Bravo you sadistic bastards.

Chief among the questions that needed to be answered is this: what is the island? Now, I know the first reaction many will have is that they already answered that in the Richard episode.   No they didn’t.  Jacob said the Island was the cork of evil.  If you actually think that constitutes and answer, you need your fucking head examined.   During the writers strike a couple of years ago,  a LOST writer held up a sign that said something to the effect of {I know what the Island is, do you?}, indicating that if the strike didn’t end well, fans might never have known the answer.  Imagine if LOST had ended then and there.  Now imagine you find yourself in a room with Carlton Cuse, and you ask him “what was the Island??”   He responds  ”it was a cork.”   Now imagine yourself standing over him after you just kicked him in the nuts.

The function of the Island may be to cork evil, but that doesn’t tell you what it is exactly.  Throughout the show, there has been a significant amount of evidence that the Island was reasonably sentient.  That’s not to say it was intelligent specifically, but if The Island wanted the Oceanic 6 to return,  then clearly there’s something going on there.

My final thought was that perhaps the Island was the Garden of Eden.  This seemed to fit somewhat with the mentions of Adam and Eve.   I have no idea if I was right.   I do reject the idea that the Island was Purgatory, despite the fact that it held so many ghosts.  I think the ghosts were there because the Island still needed them.  More on that later.

What the hell was the smoke monster? Again, we got a partial answer here. We know that the smoke monster was released when Jacob threw his brother down into the Goonies cave at the heart of the Island.   Subsequently the Smoke Monster took the form of Jacob’s Brother and occasionally other dead people until getting trapped in Locke’s form (or so it was implied; that might not be the case).  But what was it?  After the Jacob/ MIB episode, I came to believe that the Smoke Monster was Lucifer/ Satan.  It occurred to me that the “evil spirits” that possessed Claire and Sayid may have been other demons from hell.  If that was the case, then DeathLocke/ MIB/ Smokey was trying to get them all killed so more spirits could possess their bodies.  …nope.

Where did all the wine go? Okay yes, that is kind of a joke, but there are serious questions behind it.   What is with all the drinking? Jacob, Richard, Jack and Hurley were all given superpowers by drinking.  The first two got it through drinking wine (which I assume is a reference to the Blood of Christ) and the last two were forced to drink nasty, dirty water.   Which leads me to a better question.  Drinking the wine gave Jacob and Richard their abilities.  But drinking the water didn’t seem to do anything but make Jack stop being such a mopey tool.  Did Jacob give Jack a placebo? I thought maybe Jacob had turned the water into wine, but Hurley clearly drank brown water.  We don’t know what happened to Hurley, so theoretically he could have lived for hundreds of years.   I have my doubts though.

What was up with the Goonies cave? When Jacob thew his brother down the cave at the Heart of the Island, the mere presence of his body released the Smoke Monster.  And yet both Desmond and Jack (not to mention 3 other people standing in the mouth) actually walk up to a literal cork and play with it. Mmm-hmm.  So Desmond takes the stopper out of the magic bathtub and Unicron screams and the Island starts to fall apart.   And then Jack just puts it back in and the bath tub fills up again.   That’s it?  Nothing was released from Hell?  Really?

What happened to Desmond? Widmore asked Desmond to do a job.  The implication was that Desmond was flashing sideways to get the LOST crew together to go to the sideways Island.  But that was a red herring.  The flash sideways world actually was Purgatory.  There would be no reason for Jacob to have Widmore send Desmond to  Purgatory. It doesn’t really seem like Jacob would even know about the sideways universe. So what happened to Desmond when the energy zapped him, and for that matter what the hell changed his mind?

And maybe the most important question.  Did Desmond ever get to see Penny and his son again? At last count, Desmond was stuck on the island with Hurley and Ben.  The plane had taken off.   Since you’re not supposed to be able to find the Island, this poses a problem for our favorite lovesick Scotsman.

Also did Hurley ever get laid?   Everyone loves Hugo.  We know this.  But it seems as though Hurley never managed to get any lovin’.  In theory Hurley could have been stuck on that Island for hundreds of years until his successor came along.  Meanwhile Libby died at the end of the second season without them ever getting together.  Joking aside, no one deserved to be loved more than Hurley, yet it seems like his was the cruelest fate.   Yeah, he eventually died and saw Libby again, but still… hundreds of years alone.

All of these were good questions that I sort of thought would be answered.  My mistake.  Granted, we did get an answer to what the Flash Sideways was.  Purgatory. Or sort of purgatory.  Technically it was a sort of Elysian Fields reference, a place the LOSTies created to find each other again, wherein they did not remember their past lives.

It’s an answer I’m happy with, but I can’t help but feel like this was the LOST writers laughing at us.   All the signs were there that this was an alternate universe.   The image of the Island underwater.  Jack’s imaginary son.  Both Sun and Claire still pregnant.   There was no real reason for these elements  (particularly the Island shot, which was unseen by anyone but the audience) except to screw with us.  I think my biggest question spinning out of the sideways Universe is about the exodus.  Why were some characters left out when they left?  Based on Desmond’s promise to Eloise, Faraday and Charlotte were left in the Purgatory universe.  And even after that very sincere apology and seeming redemption for Ben Linus, he wasn’t allowed to move on.  So why were character like Juliet and Libby allowed in?  And unless I just didn’t notice, neither Walt nor Michael were there.  Was it random?  This is probably the only question that will bother me in the long run.

Pushing aside unanswered questions, I loved the finale.  These are some of my favorite moments.

Miley Cyrus and Billy Ray do some... uhh... stretches.

  • Sun and Jin seeing Ji Yeon. (sort of)
  • Happy Hurley talking to Boone while Shannon and Sayid make out on a dirty street outside a bar.
  • Claire holding hands with Charlie.
  • Juliet and Sawyer(one of my 3 favorite couples)  reuniting.
  • The final scene between Linus and Locke. (This may be my actual #1 moment.)
  • Jack going all Leonidas on DeathLocke.

As you can see, almost all of my favorite parts were in the sideways universe.  Call me a sap, but I love happy endings.

And that may be the biggest surprise for me.  I was quite certain that the finale would end tragically, with almost everyone but Hurley dead. And yes, technically that is how it ended, but it was hardly tragic.   I think there will be a lot of people pissed off by the ending,  and I’ve even suggested that the whole thing was the writers laughing at us.  But I’m happy with it.  It’s rare that a show gives the audience satisfying character resolutions.  Almost every couple in LOST met some tragic end, either together (Sun and Jin) or apart (Kate/ Jack, Charlie/ Claire, Hugo/ Libby, Sawyer/ Juliet and presumably Desmond/ Penny, among others).  Yet in The End they all get to be together again.

In the end (pardon the pun), LOST wasn’t about the Island or the mysteries.  It was about the people whose lives were affected by it.  What’s amazing about LOST is that each of the main character and even some of the secondary characters would merit their own show, yet they manage to pull all these disparate stories together so well and give them complete plot resolutions.

Some people are saying its the best series finale ever.  I won’t go anywhere near that far.  One of the best? Certainly.  But I think the finale proved that they were making it up as they went along (at least until the last two season maybe) and that put a damper on the non- sideways scenes.  But still; great show, fantastic ending.

I hope the BSG’s writing staff was paying attention last night.  THAT’S HOW YOU DO THAT.

Your –weekly?— nerdgasm

// April 20th, 2010 // No Comments » // Humor, Nerdgasm, Scifi, Television

why aren't I watching Mad Men right now??

Esquire Magazine posted some pics and a recent interview with Christina Hendricks, better known as Joan Holloway of Mad Men.  Of course geeks will always remember her as Saffron, the rogue prostitute and thief who “married” Mal Reynolds on Joss Whedon’s Firefly.

Ohhhhh sweetsassymolassey…   I would graphically molest a telephone pole in front of a public school if I could get a week with Christina Hendricks.  She is… and I quote… built like brick shithouse.

oh my god i wish my penis was a watermelon

Thanks to Pop Candy for the link.

Your Not-Even-Close-to-Daily Nerdgasm

// April 13th, 2010 // 1 Comment » // Humor, Nerdgasm, Scifi, Television

I’ve never been exposed much to Doctor Who.  As a kid I thought it was some off shoot/ rip off of Hitch Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy or something.  A couple of years ago I got into Torchwood, but I still missed out on the main show.  I was kinda digging the David Tennant one off specials that were airing on BBCAmerica for the last year.   Now I’m still not that big a fan of the Doctor, but… I am very much on board… because… well…

rug... curtains... match... flame... red.... agrhjlkjlj.kjkljlknm.,.....

Amy Pond.  Or more accurately Karen Gillan who plays Amy Pond, the Doctor’s new companion.  I may not freak out over the last remaining Time Lord but hot damn I can get behind a smokin’ red head.

Oh Amy… Amy Pond…  You have no idea how much bad erotic fan fic I’m going to write about you over the coming year.   Not to mention dirty haiku’s.

Seriously people, if Karen had been on board with David Tennant this show would be the President of the United States right now.

oh lord, PLEASE have handcuffs on you!

Not a chance, Matt Smith. Don't even think it.

My only real complaint is that she’s paired with Matt Smith.  He may make a fine Doctor, but for crepes sakes– he looks like someone slapped a bow tie on Gollum.  Look at him!  There is dude who wants his precious.

Fat Hobbit helps The Master.

Politics In Comics

// January 17th, 2010 // No Comments » // Comics, Movies, Scifi, Television, short fiction

One of the things I’ve had to learn to accept as a Conservative writer is that I’m pretty much alone.

Not totally mind you.  There are others out there.  We have decoder rings and communicate through smoke signals (it’s the only way to be secure).

But regardless of what medium you operate in- books, movies, stand-up comedy or comic books-  writers tend to be liberal.   In and of itself that isn’t a problem.  It would be ignorant of me to suggest that no one should be allowed to express their beliefs in comics– ignorant, and to be sure, hypocritical. Good writing should affect you deeply and will always make you think, even if you disagree.

So I’m not talking about censorship.  I’m talking about ugliness.

More and more lately, I find myself having to make excuses for writers of whom I am a fan.  No, I won’t name anyone.  I read comments both online and even in comics that basically insult me as a fan and a consumer.   I realize that a majority of the writing community is left-leaning, but why do they assume that their audience is as well?  I won’t throw polls and statistics at you, but the majority of Americans are right leaning on some level (which isn’t to say totally).  But even if we were only 40% of your audience, why would someone want to insult us for a cheap laugh?  It’s the equivalent of going to a Klan rally and telling black jokes.  It may be funny to a few people who think that way, but to the rest of us, it’s just sad.

It’s hard to look at someone you used to admire and think that they have no problem with insulting you just because you disagree with them. When other people do it, I get angry.  But in these situations, well- it just makes me sad.

The Comics community is pretty insular.  These days everything feels like a war.  Like sides are trying to get you to choose between them in a violent, grizzly game of Red Rover, Red Rover.    Do we as fans and writers need to be like that?  Isn’t the industry on unstable ground as it is?

I’m not saying we should hold hands and hug or something.  But maybe we should leave the politics to the news networks.

Just saying.